steuard: (Default)
Monday, November 8th, 2010 08:52 pm
My mother really, really loves Skype. That's really caught me off guard, because for some reason I've never been very excited by it. So I want to know: do any of you folks use Skype regularly? And can anyone suggest why I might be more hesitant about Skype than I generally am about nifty-sounding new technologies? ('Cause thus far, I haven't come up with any plausible explanation.)

More background and some possibilities... )

I suspect that (for example) Kim and I would have loved Skype when we were living far apart after college: seeing each others' faces more often would have been wonderful. So why haven't I leapt at the chance to have that same extra closeness with family and friends today?
steuard: (Default)
Wednesday, September 22nd, 2010 10:59 pm
Here's what I want as my computer desktop image, or maybe as a screensaver:

I want a pretty landscape, maybe a mountain lake with some nearby woods. I want the lighting of the scene to follow a more or less real time 24-hour day/night cycle (including shadows, appropriate tints for dawn and dusk, things like illumination by moonlight, and stars in the sky at night). If possible, I want the appearance to adjust to follow the seasons in real time, too. (Including a bit of variation in weather or at least clouds would be interesting as well, though I'd want to be able to forbid completely overcast skies.) Something like this may exist: anyone know?

But... I want this simulated landscape to be located on a habitable, Earthlike moon of a gas giant planet. (Rings? Maybe.) The scene's lighting should be based on not just the sun but also light reflected from the sunlit parts of the central planet (and perhaps on any other moons that pass nearby in their own orbits), and the planet's appearance in the sky should be scientifically accurate. The seasonal cycle should be based at least generally on some calculation of solar heating based on the orbits involved. (That might not be much different than what we're familiar with, but I'd want to check. Would there be any significant monthly cycle on top of the annual one?) It might even be fun to include some mildly spectacular feature somewhere in the night sky, too: a nearby nebula or cluster, maybe. Bonus points if there is a practical orbit for another inhabited moon of the gas giant to occasionally come close enough to see continents and weather patterns (and city lights at night).

I'd be amazed if anyone had actually written a program encompassing this whole idea, but I think it should be possible today. If it were done well (with good attention to both art and science, and with configurable details if possible), I'd be willing to pay a fairly substantial price for it.
steuard: (Default)
Tuesday, August 3rd, 2010 10:18 pm

Two vaguely noteworthy bits of internet advertising recently:

  • Hoping to undermine my marriage, some spammer told me to "Search for Your Soulmate" on the day of my tenth wedding anniversary. Hey, fake-eHarmony: knock it off!
  • Just how much does Google know about me, anyway? When my NoScript extension for Firefox[1] was updated this morning, the "What's new" page showed an ad for today's primary election here in Michigan. Ok, fine, they know my IP address is in the state. But this ad specifically invited me to "vote across the aisle" for a Republican gubernatorial candidate. How exactly does Google Ads know I'm a Democrat? I mean, I wouldn't be surprised if Google could in fact deduce that to fairly high probability, but is that actually what's happening here? (Does Google offer political affiliation targeting as an explicit option?) Or is this more likely just a gamble that NoScript users lean Democratic?

[1] Use it! Even in its unobtrusive "default allow" mode, it's great protection.

steuard: (Default)
Thursday, April 29th, 2010 06:09 pm
This weekend, Kim and I are going to Penguicon, a "Science Fiction and Open Source Software Convention" near Detroit. I've never actually been to a con before, so it should be a fun experience. This one's a little unusual with its "open source" aspect, but Kim figures that's a plus for me: if there's a time when the sci-fi side of things doesn't match my interests, I can go hang out with a bunch of Linux geeks and pretend I never abandoned them for a Mac. :) (I've still got at least some open source cred, since I've contributed a few bits of code to Firefox in the past.)

Any advice for how to have an enjoyable con experience? (I wonder if I should try to perform my Silmarillion-inspired Simon and Garfunkel parody at one of the Open Filk nights. Hmm.)
steuard: (Default)
Tuesday, April 13th, 2010 04:29 pm
Anyone know a good reason why I shouldn't get (via startup funds at work) one of the new MacBook Pro 15" i7 models? More importantly, does anyone have advice on

1) glossy vs. matte screen?

2) standard hard drive vs. solid state drive?

I'm leaning toward the cheaper glossy screen and the much cheaper standard hard drive at this point. (I've heard oddly negative things about Apple's solid state drive technology, in fact.)

(A more extreme possibility would be to get a 13" model instead, for the greater portability and slightly better battery life. But I think I want something with pretty high end processing power so I can use it for research when I'm away from work. We've got our cute netbook if we really want portability.)

[Edit: Fixed typo in first sentence: shouldN'T!]
steuard: (Default)
Friday, January 8th, 2010 07:38 pm
I appear to unexpectedly be the owner of an Eee PC. I know very little about these things, but it seems to be a fairly high end recent model (EEEPC 1005HA), with an Atom 280 processor, 1GB RAM, 160GB hard drive, multi-touch capability, and a bunch of other features. It apparently runs Windows XP, though I assume I could install Linux on it if I tried (though I'd need to figure out how to do that without an optical drive).

So, who out there has used these before? What sorts of things should I expect to work well, and what should I watch out for? Given that I'm reasonably comfortable with both Windows and Linux (despite being mostly a Mac person these days), is there any especially good reason to get rid of Windows? Either way, should I expect much trouble getting Firefox up and running?

It's very cute, regardless.
steuard: (physics)
Thursday, April 30th, 2009 11:10 am
You know what I hate about computers? Or rather, to be totally unfair, about PCs? When they go wrong it's a complete disaster, and yet they leave you feeling like it's your fault.

Whiny details behind the cut. )

To get back to my original point, I walked away from this maddening, disappointing experience feeling like I was the one who had done something wrong. If only I had gotten to the classroom even earlier before class to get things set up, my lecture would have gone smoothly. If only I had spent more time using PC laptops lately, I would have known what to do. If only I'd been smarter about what to search for in help, or about where to look for the right settings, or about hunting through all the special Dell-specific function key labels on the keyboard...

But it doesn't have to be that way. Every single time I have gone to give a talk with my Powerbook (including the very first), it Just Worked. At the worst, all I had to do was to pull down the little display menu at the top and click "Detect Displays" (or open the Displays preference pane and hit the same button, or search for either "displays" or "mirroring" in system help, or...). Yes, I know "It Just Works" is an advertising slogan, but it's also been exactly my experience. You shouldn't have to outsmart your computer to make it work.
steuard: (Default)
Saturday, March 22nd, 2008 11:23 am
Well, my fears that my entire laptop was quickly turning into an expensive paperweight have receded. Someone pointed out that even fairly thorough memory tests may not catch problem RAM, and that a better test would be to actually pull out RAM modules and see if the problem persisted. Sure enough, ever since I replaced the new memory upgrade I'd gotten a few months ago with the smaller original module, the problems with my laptop seem to have gone away. (Whether Leopard will be happy with just 512MB of RAM is another question, though it seems to be doing fine thus far.) I wonder why it took so long to give out?

Anyway, whew. Now I can actually do some of the work I've been putting off over spring break.
Tags:
steuard: (Default)
Saturday, March 22nd, 2008 12:09 am
I appear to have a serious problem with my laptop, and I'm wondering if any of the technically savvy folks I know have any advice on what to do about it. Since I'm guessing that most people aren't particularly interested in reading about problems with my four(?) year old Powerbook (possibly related to overheating), I'll hide most of this behind a cut. (Whether you have technical advice or not, I'd also welcome any thoughts or advice on whether the tech support people in my local Apple Store are a reasonable option in a situation like this.)

The timing on this is particularly poor, since I'm giving the physics colloquium at Mudd on Tuesday. (My presentation is backed up in several places, but I'd planned on updating it a bit before then. In any case, I should start looking for a computer to borrow to give it with. Hmm... maybe the other folks in my office would have one to lend for the day.)


More details than you ever wanted to know... )
steuard: (Default)
Thursday, January 24th, 2008 04:30 pm
I figure I'd mention this separately, since it's actually kinda cool. (I have no idea how recent this is, but I hadn't seen it before.) When I wanted to contact Amazon.com to tell them that their apparent price gouging (intentional or not) was not reasonable, I noticed that there was now an option to talk to them on the phone. But they don't list a number.

Instead (and you have to be logged in to do this), you are asked to give your phone number so that they can call you. You can specify when you want to be called: 5 minutes, 10 minutes, etc. I chose "Right away", and I clicked the submit button. And it was pretty eerie: my phone started ringing, right away. I picked it up, and after a brief "your call may be monitored" message, I was transferred immediately to a customer service agent. (No menu system, no hold music, nothing.)

He seemed to understand exactly why I was displeased by the behavior of the site, apologized, and said that he was sending the issue to their website team. (Of course the website team may just trash the complaint and tally one more mark in the "noticed the scam" column, but at least I did something.) All in all, a highly pleasant customer service experience; I recommend it to anyone who needs to contact them. (His Indian accent wasn't too hard to understand, either.)
Tags:
steuard: (physics)
Thursday, January 24th, 2008 04:09 pm
Everyone knows that textbooks are insanely expensive, and there's often a suspicion that publishers and booksellers are ripping students off. (This seems to be especially true in the US; "international editions" tend to be much cheaper.) One reaction to that has been that more and more students (and faculty) are abandoning the campus bookstores entirely, instead opting to order books online. There's been a perception that you'll get a better deal when you aren't part of a captive audience on campus.

But a student's question has just led me to notice a particularly obnoxious pricing issue on Amazon.com. I don't know whether it's intentional, but it certainly looks unpleasant. The issue is this: I am using a textbook that comes in a single volume edition and a two volume edition. If you search on Amazon.com books for "Principles of Physics Serway Jewett", the only reasonable results are Vol. 1 and Vol. 2. A handful of used books show up along with a student solution guide, but the single volume edition doesn't turn up in the results. That's the one we're using, so this is already frustrating.

On the other hand, if you go to their textbook search page and search for the single volume's ISBN (053449143X) explicitly, it turns up just fine. But here's the kicker: its listed price is about $150. If you add up the prices of Vol. 1 and Vol. 2 from the search results, it comes out to $230. That's an $80 difference, a markup of over 50% from the lower price. And I emphasize that without the exact ISBN, a student searching for the book would never even know that the less expensive option existed.

I'm rather troubled by this.
steuard: (Default)
Friday, September 14th, 2007 07:13 pm
Just as an offhand request, does anyone out there know of a simple program for managing and searching simple lists of data? Continue for details... )