Anyone know a good reason why I shouldn't get (via startup funds at work) one of the new MacBook Pro 15" i7 models? More importantly, does anyone have advice on
1) glossy vs. matte screen?
2) standard hard drive vs. solid state drive?
I'm leaning toward the cheaper glossy screen and the much cheaper standard hard drive at this point. (I've heard oddly negative things about Apple's solid state drive technology, in fact.)
(A more extreme possibility would be to get a 13" model instead, for the greater portability and slightly better battery life. But I think I want something with pretty high end processing power so I can use it for research when I'm away from work. We've got our cute netbook if we really want portability.)
[Edit: Fixed typo in first sentence: shouldN'T!]
1) glossy vs. matte screen?
2) standard hard drive vs. solid state drive?
I'm leaning toward the cheaper glossy screen and the much cheaper standard hard drive at this point. (I've heard oddly negative things about Apple's solid state drive technology, in fact.)
(A more extreme possibility would be to get a 13" model instead, for the greater portability and slightly better battery life. But I think I want something with pretty high end processing power so I can use it for research when I'm away from work. We've got our cute netbook if we really want portability.)
[Edit: Fixed typo in first sentence: shouldN'T!]
no subject
One reference they pointed to is here:
http://blogs.zdnet.com/Apple/?p=2417&tag=nl.e539
Another poster said he was very happy with the glossy choice, and still another reports,
This appears to be a matter of personal preference, and possibly usage environment.
For hard drives, I haven't seen as much about this, several people commented in different threads about putting in their own drives. I think traditional is just fine. Apple has learned that they have a certain percentage of their user base who, when given the choice of $X, $2X, and $4X, will buy the product in the $4X space, because, "It's more expensive and I don't know what it means, but it must be the best." In this case I think that solid state may allow you to eek a little more performance out of your battery life, but if you're frequently plugged in this may not matter much to you.
--Beth
no subject
I'm looking forward to the new computer! (Now, how much use should I make of the automatic migration assistant? I guess I've got plenty of time to play with that.)
no subject
no subject
In short, I didn't trust the results, so I copied files I wanted over by hand and reinstalled all software I cared about manually. I waited until after I owned an iPod touch and then used that to transfer my calendar and contacts data between machines. I'm sure that also got rid of some cruft I didn't need too.
YMMV.
--Beth
no subject
no subject
--Beth
no subject
SSD's have much higher sustained read speeds. If you think you'd be reading large files on a regular basis, they _might_ be worth it, but probably not.
You might want to shell out the $400 for 8GB of RAM. That's less than you'll have to shell out later if you decide to upgrade from 4 to 8 GB. Just logging in and starting Firefox, KMail, and Adium will consume well over 2GB of RAM. That's not leaving too much room for a serious Mathematica session.