January 2017

M T W T F S S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16 171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Sunday, January 7th, 2007 06:24 pm
Now that I'm recovered enough from my knee-related fun over the summer, I'm planning to start bicycling to work at least some of the time. One flaw in that plan is that I do not, at this time, own a bicycle. In fact, I know next to nothing about what to look for in a bicycle: the last time I was shopping for one, I had very different needs and expectations (and hey, maybe bicycle technology has changed in the past fifteen years). So I put it to you, blogosphere: what kind of bicycle should I buy (and does it matter where I buy it)?

A bit more information: I live about 2.5 miles from work. I have my choice of riding to campus on a moderately busy street (Arrow Highway) or on a convenient bike path that runs right behind my apartment complex (most of the way, anyway). The route seems basically flat, though that perception could change once I'm riding rather than driving. I'm in decent shape apart from the knee thing (and my physical therapist tells me that bike riding would be good for me). I expect that most of my riding will be done during the day or early evening (but during the winter, the sun might certainly have set before I head home). I don't foresee any major off-road biking in my future. If there are other significant details that I haven't thought of, let me know!

Once I've picked a bike, what else should I make a point of doing or having done or buying to be set to go? (I don't know what happened to my old helmet, so I know that I'll need to get a new one.) Any advice from others who have tried this sort of thing?
Tags:
Monday, January 8th, 2007 06:46 pm (UTC)
Your first sentence amuses me :).

And yeah, I do think bike path and road quality vary tremendously by geography. Oddly the roads here suck too (I mean, we have winter. it does awful things to the road surface. Also, we have Boston drivers), but there's an enormous culture of road cycling -- way more than I saw in southern California despite its obviously superior infrastructure and climate. And we have a few excellent paths, but the stupidity density on them is so high that I can't take it. n-1 of my collisions have been on paths or on path/road transitions. (The remaining 1 was on a road, with no cars, due to a road surface condition that I totally should have been paying more attention to.) So I tend to think of paths as high-collision-likelihood areas (and badly-designed paths really do increase collision likelihoods, per googling on crash statistics).

But if I could get a well-maintained, low-traffic, few-crossings path? Yeah, that'd be sweet.